What the…. – Muzz Napolitano should stick with Homeland, not Canadian immigration policy

I kinda like Canada – I like it a lot – a second home, next to England, of course.

So, being the protective kinda, I don’t like people sticking their noses in where it is not wanted – and that is exactly where she is sticking it – and for what reason?

The thing that irks me more than anything – and if she should want to do something about it – is all those illegal guns that are being smuggled over the border INTO Canada – what is she on about terrorists routinely crossing the border into the US, FROM Canada?

“Yes, Canada is not Mexico. It doesn’t have a drug war going on; it didn’t have 6,000 homicides that were drug-related last year,” Napolitano said.

“Nonetheless, to the extent that terrorists have come into our country or suspected or known terrorists have entered our country across a border, it’s been across the Canadian border. There are real issues there.”

When Macdonald asked if she was referring to the 9/11 perpetrators, Napolitano answered: “Not just those but others as well.”

Erm – who, what, where!?

Napolitano misunderstood question, handlers say

So fucking handle her better! The total myth that the 11/9/01 terrorists entered the US through Canada is, well – a big lie, at best a total myth!

And if she believes this – then why is she Homeland Security Secretary?

Napolitano issued a statement later Tuesday to clarify her remarks.

While she knows no 9/11 terrorists entered the U.S. through Canada, she said, “there are other instances … when suspected terrorists have attempted to enter our country from Canada to the United States.

“Some of these are well known to the public, such as the millennium bomber, while others are not due to security reasons.”

That would be a retraction then!

Look – I don’t know if she – or her handlers, really understand how long the border is between the US and Canada – if the US wants to build a border fence – I don’t think that many Canadians will be jumping over it to get into the US, rather – it would be the other way around – there are a lot of US citizens who come over here to get free healthcare, but that is an aside. You can drive along that border and then cross it with impunity – like Palin does when killing wolves and not even know you are in a different nation.

Muzz Napolitano what are your real reasons for wanting a fence built between the US and Canada?

A number of Canadians have stopped going to the US as is – so if you want more to stop doing so by building a fence – do it – and that is not me, that is Canadians saying it – you know, the ordinary ones.

Canada is not Mexico – as she rightly said – and it never will be.

But then, Napolitano appeared to make matters worse by explaining to the border conference [on] Tuesday why the Canada and Mexico borders should be treated equally.

“The fact of the matter is that Canada allows people into its country that we do not allow into ours,” she said.

“That’s why you have to have a border, and you have to have border policies that make sense.”

Canada does! But Canada is a sovereign nation – NOT a US State! So what has it got to do with the US WHO Canada lets in to OUR Country?

Canada more lax than U.S. about whom it lets in, Napolitano says.

Read some of the comments on that CBC story – it shows you how Canadians feel, in England we would say “You have dropped a bollock!” but you wouldn’t understand that.

Add to FacebookAdd to NewsvineAdd to DiggAdd to Del.icio.usAdd to StumbleuponAdd to RedditAdd to BlinklistAdd to TwitterAdd to TechnoratiAdd to Furl


About Bolshy

Blogging in the ether to see if that elusive literary agent or publisher wants some new talent.
This entry was posted in Blah!, Blogs, Comment, Democracy, I shit you not, Modern Liberty, Personal Opinion, Personal philosophy, Politics, United States of America. Bookmark the permalink.

0 Responses to What the…. – Muzz Napolitano should stick with Homeland, not Canadian immigration policy

  1. notscarenews says:

    I have to make it public. It’s suppose to be secret, however most people in Austin, Tx knows about it. The police department has machine that can read your mind. A machine that can read someone’s mind will be used to violate EVERYONE’S CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS!!! It can also change the way you feel. Sexual impulses, anger, and paranoia are all feelings they can induce to you at their fingertips. This means it can cause a girl or boy to feel sexual, and get raped thinking they wanted to. Its like a drug. This is just one of the many crimes they commit with this machine RIGHT NOW!!!! They are using it right now to spy on their citizens RIGHT NOW!!! People will be spied on in there homes, without a warrant. (this means someone will be able to watch you during sex without your knowledge.) There are a lot of people all over the United States knowing about this machine. The police department is able to use it to spy on people in their own home. During interrogation they keep a person dazed, confused and not sound of mind to cohersed them into making certain statements. This is a violation of these people’s constitutional rights. Start thinking about how the government has given the police department a weapon to commit not only one of the biggest civil and constitutional rights violations of all time, but to commit war crimes such as rape, brainwashing, and toturing people without the victim’s knowledge. I know it is hard to believe, however if you happen to know someone in the police department who cares for you enough, just ask if they have a machine that can read and control people’s mind. After that, I would also like people to think about how we are able to get the government to stop letting the police department violate the people’s civil and constitutional rights, and committing war crimes against there own citizens. Major media companies have knowledge of this, but are not willing to broadcast it. People need to find out and talk about this issue.

  2. reaganiterepublican says:

    All who were left scratching their heads when Obama chose this obedient toady to head Homeland Security now can get a handle on it: a serious appointee, focused upon real terrorist threats (not imaginary, partisan ones i.e. the TEA parties) -like, say, a Rudolph Giuliani- wouldn’t have been a willing collaborator in a sham report trashing US vets for disgraceful political purposes.

    Napolitano’s qualification for this job was purely being a liberal Obama sycophant… certainly not any skills, insight, or ability.

    Her recent statements on Canadian border security illustrate how incompetent and puzzled she really is- completely lacking the credentials to be in charge of protecting our country from the likes of Al Qaida.

    Trouble is, narcissists like Obama need to be surrounded by mindless drones to confirm their omnipotence and, in this case, pollyanna world view. But such appointments as Napolitano and Panetta to vital national security posts are a show of weakness that will surely encourage terrorists and other rogue characters who see America as their enemy- no matter how hard Barack tries to schmooze them.

    Unfortunately, anyone who expected The One to place the nation’s practical defense interests above those of his own political security and radical agenda hasn’t really looked at how he got this far in the first place.


By all means, leave your 2 bobs worth

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s